Close

Former Senior LA Prosecutor.
Harvard Law School Educated.
Now Providing an Aggressive Defense For You.

Los Angeles DUI Legal Limit

Driving under the influence (DUI) charges in Los Angeles carry significant consequences that can alter your life. While the common understanding is that California law establishes a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) limit of 0.08 percent for adult drivers, the reality of California's DUI laws is much more intricate and far-reaching. It's crucial to understand that you can face DUI charges even with a BAC below 0.08 percent, and different rules apply to drivers under 21, commercial drivers, and those on DUI probation. Comprehending the legal limit for DUI in Los Angeles necessitates an examination of the California Vehicle Code, relevant sections of the California Penal Code, applicable jury instructions, and the potential penalties upon conviction. If you have been charged with a DUI, do not hesitate to contact a skilled DUI defense lawyer to help you understand your rights and protect your future.

What Is the Legal Limit for DUI in Los Angeles?

California Vehicle Code Section 23152(b) serves as the primary statute defining it as unlawful to operate a vehicle with a BAC of 0.08 percent or higher. This standard is widely adopted across the United States. However, simply having a measured BAC of 0.08 percent or more at the time of testing doesn't automatically equate to a DUI conviction. The prosecution typically bears the burden of proving that your BAC was 0.08 percent or higher while you were driving, not just when the test was administered. This distinction allows for scenarios where a BAC result at a police station or hospital might be below 0.08 percent, yet the prosecutor can argue that the BAC was higher when the individual was behind the wheel.

The concepts of "rising blood alcohol" and "falling blood alcohol" are vital in these situations. If a driver consumed alcohol shortly before driving, their BAC might still be increasing after being stopped, meaning the measured BAC at the time of testing could be higher than it was during driving. Conversely, if drinking ceased well before driving, the BAC might be decreasing at the time of the test. In such cases, both prosecution and defense experts may employ scientific calculations, factoring in elements like the type and quantity of alcohol consumed, the time of consumption, the individual's body weight, metabolism rate, and other relevant factors, to estimate the BAC at the time of driving.

Exceptions to the 0.08 Percent Legal Limit in Los Angeles

California law extends beyond the 0.08 percent threshold for adult drivers, establishing different standards for specific categories of drivers.

  • Underage Drivers: California has a "zero tolerance" law for drivers under the age of 21. According to California Vehicle Code Section 23136, it is illegal for an underage driver to operate a vehicle with a BAC of 0.01 percent or higher. This significantly lower threshold reflects the legislature's strong stance against underage drinking and driving, with consequences including a mandatory one-year suspension of driving privileges for testing at or above this level.
  • Drivers on DUI Probation: Individuals on DUI probation face an even stricter standard. They are prohibited from driving with any measurable amount of alcohol in their system. If someone on DUI probation is found to have a BAC of 0.01 percent or more, they can face severe repercussions, including additional license suspension and new criminal charges, depending on the specific circumstances.
  • Commercial Drivers: Commercial drivers in California are subject to a lower BAC limit of 0.04 percent when operating commercial vehicles. Violating this standard can jeopardize a commercial driver's license and their livelihood, even if the BAC level appears low under the standard for non-commercial adult drivers.
  • Driving Under the Influence: Importantly, a person can be charged with DUI under California Vehicle Code Section 23152(a) even if their measured BAC is below 0.08 percent or if no BAC test was administered. This section makes it a crime to drive "under the influence" of alcohol. Impairment can be demonstrated through evidence such as the driver's behavior, driving patterns (e.g., swerving, speeding), performance on field sobriety tests (FSTs), and the arresting officer's observations of signs of intoxication like slurred speech or bloodshot eyes. In these cases, the prosecution focuses on proving that the driver's impairment was such that they could not safely operate a vehicle, rather than relying on a specific BAC reading.
Key DUI Laws in the California Vehicle and Penal Codes

While most DUI offenses are prosecuted under the California Vehicle Code, the California Penal Code becomes relevant in specific situations, particularly when a DUI results in injury or death.

  • Felony DUI and Vehicular Manslaughter: When a DUI incident leads to injury, felony DUI charges can be filed under Vehicle Code Section 23153. In the tragic event of a fatality, more severe charges, such as vehicular manslaughter under Penal Code Section 191.5(b) or gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated under Penal Code Section 191.5(a), may be brought. These Penal Code sections carry substantial penalties, including lengthy state prison sentences, far exceeding those of a typical misdemeanor DUI, reflecting the severity of causing a death while impaired.
  • DUI with a Minor Passenger: California Vehicle Code Section 23572 VC addresses the enhancement for driving under the influence with a minor passenger under the age of 14. This enhancement can lead to additional jail time, ranging from 48 hours for a first offense to 90 days for a fourth or subsequent offense, on top of the penalties for the underlying DUI. Furthermore, such conduct can also lead to separate charges of child endangerment under California Penal Code Section 273(a) PC, which can be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony.
  • Other Penal Code Sections: While not directly addressing the act of driving under the influence, other Penal Code sections can be relevant in DUI cases. For instance, Penal Code Section 647(f) PC addresses public intoxication, which can sometimes be a related charge or a lesser included offense in certain DUI scenarios.
What Factors Can Turn a Misdemeanor DUI into a Felony in California?

Several factors can elevate a misdemeanor DUI to a felony or result in enhanced penalties. These include:

  • Multiple Prior DUI Convictions: Having three or more prior DUI convictions within ten years can lead to a felony DUI charge.
  • Injury to Another Person: As mentioned under Vehicle Code Section 23153, causing injury while driving under the influence can result in felony charges with increased penalties, including additional prison time for each injured victim, up to a maximum of three years.
  • High Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC): Driving with a BAC of 0.15 percent or higher can lead to enhanced penalties, including longer jail sentences and extended DUI education programs, as outlined in Vehicle Code 23578 VC.
  • Speeding and Reckless Driving: Under Vehicle Code Section 23582 VC, if you are driving under the influence and speeding excessively (20 mph or more over the limit on a city street or 30 mph or more on a highway) while also driving recklessly, you can face an additional 60 days of jail time.
  • Refusal to Submit to Chemical Testing: Refusing to take a blood or breath test after a DUI arrest can result in increased jail time and a longer driver's license suspension under Vehicle Code Section 23577 VC.
  • Driving with a Minor Under 14: As previously mentioned under Vehicle Code Section 23572 VC, having a child under 14 in the vehicle during a DUI can lead to additional mandatory jail time.

California law employs "sentencing enhancements" that can increase jail or prison time if certain aggravating factors are present.

How California Jury Instructions (CALCRIM) Affect DUI Trials

Jury instructions are crucial as they guide the jury on the legal standards and elements the prosecution must prove for a conviction. In California DUI cases, the Judicial Council of California Criminal Jury Instructions (CALCRIM) are commonly used. Two key instructions for misdemeanor DUI are:

  • CALCRIM 2110 - Driving Under the Influence (Vehicle Code § 23152(a)): This instruction addresses the charge of driving under the influence of alcohol. It mandates that the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant drove a vehicle and, at the time of driving, was under the influence of alcohol. "Under the influence" is defined as having one's mental or physical abilities so impaired by alcohol that they can no longer drive with the caution of a sober person using ordinary care under similar circumstances. The instruction clarifies that the manner of driving alone is not sufficient to establish impairment but is a factor to be considered alongside all other circumstances. It also includes considerations for blood alcohol test results and the legal presumption related to a BAC of 0.08 percent or more at the time of testing.
  • CALCRIM 2111 - Driving With 0.08 Percent Blood Alcohol (Vehicle Code § 23152(b)): This instruction pertains to the charge of driving with a BAC of 0.08 percent or more. It requires the prosecution to prove that the defendant drove a vehicle and that, at the time of driving, the defendant's BAC was 0.08 percent or higher. This instruction often explains how the prosecution may use chemical test results and expert testimony regarding retrograde extrapolation to estimate the BAC at the time of driving. The jury is also instructed on the potential challenges to the accuracy and reliability of breath, blood, or urine tests that the defense may present.

In a DUI jury trial, the defense has the right to challenge the accuracy of chemical tests, including breath, blood, or urine tests. Arguments can be raised regarding issues with testing procedures, the calibration and maintenance of testing equipment, the chain of custody of samples, and the qualifications of the personnel involved in the testing process. If the jury finds that the prosecution has failed to prove any essential element of the offense, whether it be actual impairment under CALCRIM 2110 or the numerical BAC value under CALCRIM 2111, the defendant cannot be convicted of that specific charge.

Other relevant CALCRIM instructions in DUI cases may include instructions related to prior DUI convictions (e.g., CALCRIM 2125), DUI causing injury (e.g., CALCRIM 2100), and vehicular manslaughter (e.g., CALCRIM 220-226). The specific instructions given will depend on the charges and the evidence presented in the case.

How Prosecutors and Defense Attorneys Prove BAC and DUI Impairment

In most DUI prosecutions, chemical test results from breath or blood samples are central to the prosecution's case. Breath tests provide immediate results, while blood test results may take longer to process. While the prosecution will typically present these test results to argue that the defendant's BAC exceeded the legal limit, the defense can present expert testimony to challenge the reliability and accuracy of these results. Scientific defenses might include arguments about fermentation in blood samples, improper calibration of breathalyzer machines, or errors in the handling and storage of samples.

Physical and behavioral observations made by law enforcement officers often play a significant role in supporting or undermining the prosecution's case. Officers frequently document driving patterns such as swerving, speeding, or erratic braking, along with the driver's performance on standardized field sobriety tests (FSTs). These tests typically include the walk-and-turn, one-leg-stand, and horizontal gaze nystagmus tests. However, defense counsel can challenge the subjectivity of these tests, arguing that factors such as environmental conditions, the driver's nervousness or anxiety, or underlying medical conditions unrelated to alcohol consumption could explain poor performance on the FSTs.

DUI Sentencing Guidelines and Penalties in Los Angeles

If a defendant is convicted of a DUI in California, the sentencing can vary significantly depending on factors such as whether it is a first, second, third, or subsequent offense within ten years, whether there were any injuries involved, and the defendant's BAC level.

First Misdemeanor DUI: For a first-time misdemeanor DUI conviction in Los Angeles, typical penalties may include:

  • Jail Time: 48 hours to 6 months in county jail, although many first-time offenders may avoid jail time by accepting probation or alternative sentencing programs.
  • Fines: $390 to $1,000, plus significant court fees and assessments that can substantially increase the total cost.
  • Probation: A period of informal probation typically lasting three to five years, with conditions such as obeying all laws and not driving with any measurable amount of alcohol.
  • DUI School: Mandatory completion of a DUI education program, typically lasting 3 to 9 months.
  • License Suspension: A driver's license suspension for a minimum of 6 months.
  • Ignition Interlock Device (IID): The court may order the installation of an IID in the offender's vehicle, requiring them to provide a breath sample before starting the car.

Second DUI Conviction (within 10 years): A second DUI conviction within ten years results in enhanced penalties, including:

  • Jail Time: A mandatory minimum of 4 to 10 days in jail, with a maximum of six months.
  • Fines: Significantly increased fines and court costs.
  • DUI School: A longer mandatory alcohol education program, typically lasting 18 to 30 months.
  • License Suspension: A two-year suspension of the driver's license.
  • Probation: Formal or informal probation, often with stricter terms.
  • IID: Mandatory installation of an IID in any vehicle driven by the offender.

Third DUI Conviction (within 10 years): A third DUI conviction within ten years leads to even more severe consequences:

  • Jail Time: A mandatory minimum of 120 days in jail, with a maximum of one year.
  • Fines: Substantially increased fines and court costs.
  • DUI School: A mandatory alcohol education program lasting 18 to 30 months.
  • License Suspension: A three-year suspension of the driver's license.
  • Probation: Formal or informal probation with stringent conditions.
  • IID: Mandatory installation of an IID in any vehicle driven by the offender.

Fourth or Subsequent DUI Conviction (within 10 years): A fourth or subsequent DUI conviction within ten years can be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony:

  • Felony Charge: If charged as a felony, penalties can include up to three years in state prison, significant fines, an 18 to 30-month DUI education program, a four-year driver's license revocation, and mandatory IID installation.
  • Misdemeanor Charge: If charged as a misdemeanor, penalties include a minimum of 180 days in county jail, increased fines, an 18 to 30-month DUI education program, a three-year driver's license suspension, and mandatory IID installation.

DUI with Injury (Felony DUI - VC 23153): If someone is injured as a result of a DUI, the charge will likely be a felony under Vehicle Code Section 23153, leading to much harsher consequences, including potential state prison time, significant fines, restitution to the injured parties, a lengthy license suspension, and mandatory DUI education. The penalties increase with the severity of the injuries and the number of victims.

Vehicular Manslaughter (PC 191.5(b)) and Gross Vehicular Manslaughter While Intoxicated (PC 191.5(a)): In the most tragic scenarios where a DUI causes death, the prosecution may file charges of vehicular manslaughter or gross vehicular manslaughter. These are felony offenses carrying significant state prison sentences, potentially ranging from several years to life, depending on the circumstances and the specific Penal Code section violated. If the prosecution believes the defendant acted with implied malice, they may even file second-degree murder charges (often referred to as a "Watson murder").

Aggravating Factors: Certain aggravating factors can lead to increased penalties, even for a first-time DUI. These include:

  • High BAC (0.15% or higher): This can lead to longer jail sentences and extended DUI school.
  • Refusal to submit to Chemical Testing: This can result in mandatory jail time and a longer license suspension.
  • Speeding and Reckless Driving: As mentioned earlier, this can add additional jail time.
  • Driving with a Minor Under 14: Carries mandatory additional jail time.
Long-Term Consequences of a DUI Conviction in California

Beyond the direct legal penalties, a DUI conviction can have numerous collateral consequences, including:

  • Travel restrictions to certain countries.
  • A significant increase in auto insurance premiums.
  • Difficulty securing employment, particularly in professions requiring driving.
  • Potential issues with professional licensing for certain occupations.
  • A criminal record can impact various aspects of life.

These far-reaching consequences underscore the importance of vigorously fighting a DUI charge from the outset, especially in Los Angeles, where law enforcement and prosecutors are highly focused on DUI enforcement.

Strategies for Fighting DUI Charges in Los Angeles

A strong DUI defense typically involves a thorough examination of the circumstances surrounding the traffic stop to determine if the officer had a valid legal reason to initiate the stop. If the initial stop was deemed illegal, any evidence obtained subsequently might be suppressed, potentially leading to a dismissal of the charges. Defense counsel will also scrutinize whether field sobriety tests were administered correctly and whether any chemical tests were conducted following proper procedures.

Expert testimony plays a crucial role in DUI defense. A qualified toxicologist can analyze the prosecution's BAC evidence, challenge the retrograde extrapolation calculations, or identify procedural flaws in the collection, storage, and analysis of blood samples. Furthermore, the negotiation skills of the defense attorney are paramount. Many DUI cases in Los Angeles can be resolved through favorable plea agreements, where the charges might be reduced or dismissed in exchange for completing certain programs, especially if the prosecution's case has factual or procedural weaknesses.

Why a Knowledgeable DUI Attorney Is Critical

DUI law in California is notoriously complex, and the potential penalties are severe. Beyond the inconvenience of a license suspension, you face the risk of probation, jail time, substantial fines, and the long-lasting stigma of a criminal conviction on your record. This is particularly true if there are aggravating factors involved or if you have prior DUI convictions. An experienced DUI defense attorney possesses a deep understanding of the scientific aspects of chemical testing, the intricacies of the Vehicle Code, and the relevant Penal Code sections.

A skilled attorney can often challenge the arresting officer's testimony, question the reliability of the testing devices, or identify issues with the chain of custody of blood samples. They can explore opportunities to negotiate a plea bargain for a lesser offense if the case has weaknesses. Even in cases where the prosecution's evidence appears strong, an attorney with extensive experience in DUI litigation knows how to present mitigating evidence at sentencing, which could significantly reduce the potential penalties.

Navigating DUI Laws and Legal Limits in Los Angeles

If you have been charged with DUI, you must meet with a knowledgeable DUI attorney immediately at Kraut Law Group Criminal & DUI Lawyers. Michael Kraut is a former Deputy District Attorney with over 14 years of prosecutorial experience. He is widely regarded as a top-rated DUI litigator who fights hard on behalf of his clients.

For more information about the DUI legal limit and to schedule your free consultation, contact Michael Kraut at the Kraut Law Group Criminal & DUI Lawyers, Inc. located at 6255 Sunset Boulevard, Suite 1520, Los Angeles, CA 90028. Mr. Kraut can be reached 24/7 at 888-334-6344 or 323-464-6453.


Client Reviews
★★★★★
Michael Kraut is outstanding! He genuinely cared about my case and instructed my mom and I throughout the entire process. He was very clear on what he needed in order to receive the best results. He kept us updated until the end. I thank him so much for getting my charges rejected. I highly recommend him to anyone with legal needs! Shaquan
★★★★★
I contacted Michael with concern for my personal and business reputation. He was very reassuring and confident the entire time. After about 3 weeks it was determined that no charges were being filed by any agency and I was in the clear of any investigation. One thing that is amazing is just how FAST Michael is at replying to phone calls, texts, and even emails! We are talking under 30 minutes in most cases. That is unheard of for most attorneys! Michael is incredible and not your typical run of the mill attorney. For best results hire him if you feel like you might be under investigation or could face charges. Even if you know you are innocent it is best to take care of the smoke before it becomes a fire. Brad
★★★★★
Michael Kraut is-hands down-the best criminal defense attorney and I can't begin to thank him for all that he did for me and my family. I reached out to him in the middle of the night and less than a couple hours later, he had gotten back to me and scheduled a meeting. He's a no-nonsense attorney who knows how to get the job done! From the second we retained him, I had peace of mind in knowing that we were in the best hands possible. If Michael Kraut couldn't get it done, I knew that it couldn't be done at all. You can't put a price tag on your freedom. He was worth every single penny. Lida
★★★★★
Michael Kraut is an outstanding attorney. He was extremely professional, and straightforward, yet sensitive with my case. I am confident I made the right choice by hiring Michael. I highly recommend him to anyone seeking a truly experienced lawyer. Daniel
★★★★★
Michael Kraut - I cannot thank you enough for all that you did for ​my son. When I came to you I read that you used to be a district attorney but I never knew how much that meant until I watch you in court. I knew it took 3 months but the final day when I heard the judge say that all charges were dismissed it was all worth it! I will always be grateful for all that you did for us. A.N.
Contact Us