Close

Former Senior LA Prosecutor.
Harvard Law School Educated.
Now Providing an Aggressive Defense For You.

Los Angeles Negligent Operator Attorney

Drivers in Los Angeles who face traffic offenses, including driving under the influence (DUI), often focus on the immediate penalties such as fines, potential jail time, and license suspension. However, a critical secondary consequence that many are unaware of is the designation of a "negligent operator" by the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV). Once the DMV identifies an individual as a negligent operator, they may face further license suspensions or revocations beyond those resulting from the initial traffic violation or DUI conviction. Given the DMV's increasingly strict enforcement of negligent operator laws, it is crucial to understand the DMV's point system, the process of a negligent operator hearing, the relevant Penal Code sections and jury instructions in serious cases, and the potential sentencing outcomes if criminal charges are filed. Consulting with an experienced Los Angeles DUI defense attorney is essential for navigating these intricate procedures and protecting your driving privileges.

What Is a Negligent Operator Status in California?

The foundation of negligent operator status lies within the California Vehicle Code (CVC), specifically the sections outlining the DMV's point system and its authority to suspend or revoke a driver's license. According to California Vehicle Code Section 12810, the DMV is mandated to assign "points" to a driver's record for every moving violation or certain criminal convictions involving motor vehicles. These points accumulate over specified periods. If a driver accrues a certain number of points within these timeframes, the DMV can classify them as a negligent operator. The standard thresholds are:

  • Four or more points within a 12 months
  • Six or more points within 24 months.
  • Eight or more points within 36 months.

Most common traffic infractions, such as speeding tickets, typically result in one point. More severe violations can add two points to a driving record. Involvement in an at-fault traffic collision also adds one point. This point system is designed to identify drivers who present a higher risk of causing accidents or repeatedly violating traffic laws. Upon receiving a notification that you have been designated a negligent operator, the DMV has the authority to suspend your driving privileges. It's important to note that this suspension is not always automatic, and you have the right to request an administrative hearing to contest this designation. California Vehicle Code Section 12810.5 further clarifies that a person meeting these point thresholds is presumed to be a negligent operator.

Point Accumulation for DUI and Related Offenses

Driving under the influence (DUI) is a significant factor in negligent operator designations because a conviction under California Vehicle Code Section 23152 results in two points being added to a driver's record. Several other convictions also carry a two-point penalty, including a "wet reckless" (CVC 23103/23103.5), hit and run (CVC 20001), and various other misdemeanor offenses related to driving. If a driver already has existing points from prior traffic violations or collisions, even a single DUI conviction can elevate their total point count above the negligent operator threshold, leading to a DMV intervention.

Given that DUI and wet reckless convictions carry a substantial two points, they significantly increase the likelihood of facing administrative actions from the DMV. While the DMV often sends warning letters to individuals nearing a negligent operator classification, those convicted of DUI may not receive such a warning and could instead be directly notified of an impending license suspension. If you receive a letter from the DMV indicating that you are at risk of losing your driving privilege due to excessive points, it is crucial to act promptly.

The DMV Administrative Hearing Process

Upon receiving a negligent operator notice, you have the legal right to request an administrative hearing with the DMV. While this process shares some similarities with DUI-related DMV hearings, there are key distinctions. A DMV hearing officer, who is not a judge or an attorney, presides over the proceeding. Despite the seemingly informal nature, the outcome of this hearing is critical to maintaining your driving privileges. Therefore, seeking legal representation from someone experienced in these administrative hearings is highly recommended. Failing to request a hearing within the deadline specified in your notice will result in the forfeiture of your opportunity to challenge the designation, and the suspension will automatically take effect.

At the administrative hearing, your attorney can present evidence to mitigate the situation and advocate for alternative actions. Unlike DUI-only administrative hearings, where the hearing officer's discretion is somewhat limited, the hearing officer in a negligent operator hearing can consider a wider range of circumstances. For instance, evidence demonstrating improved driving habits, the necessity of a driver's license for employment, or extenuating circumstances like a family emergency that contributed to the traffic infractions may be considered relevant. The hearing officer has the authority to impose options such as placing the driver on probation instead of implementing a full license suspension.

DMV Probation and Consequences of Violations

If the DMV hearing officer decides to place you on probation, strict adherence to all conditions is required to avoid triggering a license suspension. Violations of DMV probation can occur through various actions, including committing any point-count traffic violation, failing to appear in court for a traffic case, committing any violation during another period of license suspension, being involved in an at-fault accident, or being arrested for another alcohol- or drug-related driving offense. If a violation occurs while on probation, the DMV has the authority to impose the previously suspended license term without offering any further opportunities for relief.

It is essential to understand that a negligent operator designation and any subsequent probation do not supersede other mandatory suspensions or requirements arising from a DUI conviction. For example, if a court has already mandated a DUI license suspension, you must still serve that suspension regardless of any probationary terms imposed by the DMV.

What Are the California Negligent Operator Laws?

While negligent operator issues are primarily governed by the California Vehicle Code, specific circumstances can lead to criminal charges under the California Penal Code. A primary example is vehicular manslaughter, particularly gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated, which is covered under Penal Code Section 191.5(a). According to this section, it is illegal to kill someone while driving a vehicle in violation of specific Vehicle Code sections and while committing an unlawful act, not amounting to a felony, with gross negligence. If a driver operates a vehicle under the influence of alcohol or drugs, acts with gross negligence, and this results in someone's death, prosecutors can file felony charges. In such cases, the driver faces both the administrative consequences of the negligent operator point system and the potential for severe felony penalties in criminal court, including a prison sentence of 4 to 10 years.

Another scenario where the Penal Code becomes relevant is when a hit-and-run incident results in injury or death. Although the initial hit-and-run statutes are found in the Vehicle Code, cases involving serious injuries or fatalities may also be charged under various Penal Code sections if the prosecutor believes the conduct demonstrates criminal negligence or if other criminal acts occurred in conjunction with the hit-and-run. This interaction between the Vehicle Code and the Penal Code highlights the seriousness of incidents that might begin as traffic offenses but can escalate into significant felony matters. For instance, Penal Code Section 192(c)(1) addresses vehicular manslaughter involving gross negligence, which can occur when someone commits a misdemeanor, infraction, or lawful act in a way that could cause death and does so with gross negligence.

Jury Instructions for Related Criminal Offenses

A negligent operator classification is an administrative determination by the DMV and not a criminal charge. Therefore, there isn't a specific jury instruction for "being a negligent operator" in a criminal court. However, drivers who accumulate points due to serious offenses may face criminal trials for charges such as DUI, reckless driving, or vehicular manslaughter. In these criminal trials, the California Criminal Jury Instructions (CALCRIM) become crucial in guiding the jury's understanding of the law.

  • DUI Charges: CALCRIM 2110 and CALCRIM 2111 are commonly used in DUI cases. CALCRIM 2110 explains the elements of driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs, while CALCRIM 2111 addresses driving with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) at or above the legal limit of 0.08%. CALCRIM 2100 and CALCRIM 2101 are used when the DUI offense results in injury to another person.
  • Reckless Driving: The CALCRIM 2200-series instructions focus on various aspects of reckless driving and other driving-related crimes. These instructions define reckless driving and explain the elements the prosecution must prove, such as driving with willful or wanton disregard for the safety of persons or property.
  • Vehicular Manslaughter: CALCRIM 590, 591, or 592 are relevant in cases of vehicular manslaughter. CALCRIM 592 specifically addresses gross vehicular manslaughter, including instances where it occurs while intoxicated, as outlined in Penal Code Section 192(c)(1). This instruction details the elements the prosecution must prove, such as the defendant driving a vehicle, committing a misdemeanor or infraction or otherwise lawful act that might cause death, and doing so with gross negligence, which caused the death of another person. Gross negligence is defined as acting in a reckless way that creates a high risk of death or great bodily injury, and a reasonable person would have known that acting in that way would create such a risk. CALCRIM 540A discusses felony murder in the first degree, which can be relevant in certain vehicular manslaughter cases if another felony was committed.

The specific jury instruction used will depend on the exact criminal charges filed. Each instruction outlines the necessary elements that the prosecutor must prove beyond a reasonable doubt for a conviction. If you are facing any of these criminal charges, having a defense attorney who is thoroughly familiar with these jury instructions is vital. Your lawyer can challenge whether the prosecution has adequately proven each element of the crime, present evidence to counter their claims, and argue any applicable legal defenses, such as a lack of impairment, improper procedures in chemical testing, or other procedural errors. Common defenses against vehicular manslaughter charges, for instance, include arguing that the defendant did not act with negligence or gross negligence, that their negligence did not cause the victim's death, or that the defendant was facing a sudden emergency and acted reasonably under the circumstances.

Sentencing Components for Related Criminal Offenses

When facing a criminal charge that contributed to a negligent operator status, the potential sentence can vary significantly depending on the specific offense and the defendant's prior criminal record.

  • Misdemeanor DUI: For a first-time misdemeanor DUI conviction in California, typical penalties include fines, mandatory DUI education classes, potential jail time (often a few days to several months), and a driver's license suspension. Subsequent DUI convictions carry increasingly severe penalties, including longer jail sentences, higher fines, extended license suspensions, and longer DUI education programs.
  • Felony DUI: Repeat DUIs, or DUIs that cause injury to another person, can be charged as felonies, resulting in considerably harsher sentences. Judges often consider factors such as the driver's blood alcohol level at the time of the offense, whether an accident occurred and the extent of any injuries, and the driver's overall driving history, which are the same factors that can trigger a negligent operator designation by the DMV. Penalties for felony DUI can include significant fines, lengthy prison sentences in state prison, and a long-term revocation of the driver's license. Probation with strict conditions, such as mandatory treatment programs and the installation of an ignition interlock device, may also be imposed.
  • Gross Vehicular Manslaughter While Intoxicated: For more serious offenses like gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated under Penal Code Section 191.5(a), the sentencing range increases dramatically. A conviction can lead to a prison sentence of 4 to 10 years in state prison, substantial fines up to $10,000, and a lengthy period of driver's license revocation, potentially for life in certain circumstances. The specific sentence will depend on the circumstances of the crime and the defendant's prior record.
  • Vehicular Manslaughter (without intoxication): Vehicular manslaughter under Penal Code Section 192(c)(1) can be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony, depending on the level of negligence involved. Misdemeanor vehicular manslaughter can result in up to one year in county jail, fines up to $1,000, probation, and restitution to the victim's family. Felony vehicular manslaughter with gross negligence carries potential penalties of two to six years in California state prison, fines up to $10,000, probation conditions, and restitution.

In high-stakes situations involving serious injury or death, the interplay between the criminal court's sentencing and the DMV's administrative actions adds further complexity. Even if the criminal court grants probation or a reduced sentence, the DMV may still impose a license suspension or revocation based on its own regulations and point system. Furthermore, a felony conviction can have long-lasting consequences beyond the immediate sentence, affecting future employment, housing, and the ability to obtain certain professional licenses. The DMV also has the authority to suspend or revoke a person's driver's license after a vehicular manslaughter conviction, with the duration of the suspension ranging from one year to a lifetime ban, depending on the severity of the offense and the driver's prior record.

Challenging a Negligent Operator Designation

While a DMV hearing for a negligent operator designation lacks the formal procedures of a criminal trial, it is nonetheless a critical proceeding. A successful challenge can be the determining factor between retaining your driving privileges and facing an extended license suspension. During the hearing, an experienced attorney can dispute the accuracy of the points recorded on your driving record, argue that certain convictions or accidents should not be counted towards the negligent operator status, or present evidence of mitigating circumstances. In some cases, it may be possible to demonstrate that you were not at fault in an accident or that a prior offense should not have resulted in points due to a clerical error or misclassification. The hearing officer has considerable discretion in these matters, and presenting a clear commitment to safe driving can significantly influence the outcome of the hearing.

If the administrative hearing concludes with a confirmation of your negligent operator status, you may have a limited right to appeal the decision. However, the appeals process can be complex and time-consuming, requiring a thorough understanding of DMV regulations and California law. Therefore, it is generally best to build the strongest possible case at the initial administrative hearing.

The Importance of an Experienced Attorney

The DMV's authority to suspend or revoke a driver's license is substantial. Administrative hearings are governed by specific rules of evidence and procedure that differ from those in criminal court. An attorney who regularly handles DMV matters and DUI cases possesses a deep understanding of these nuances. This familiarity can be invaluable in helping you present the most compelling arguments, gather all necessary documentation, and negotiate effectively with the DMV hearing officer. Furthermore, if you are also facing criminal charges for DUI or a related offense that contributed to the negligent operator designation, having a lawyer who can handle both the administrative and criminal aspects of your case provides crucial continuity and a strategic advantage in navigating both legal arenas.

A comprehensive defense strategy might involve challenging the legality of the initial traffic stop that led to a DUI arrest, questioning the reliability of the chemical testing procedures used to determine your blood alcohol content, or disputing the evidence presented to show that you were at fault in a traffic accident. In some instances, achieving a favorable resolution in the criminal case—such as negotiating a reduction of a DUI charge to a lesser offense like reckless driving—can help prevent the accumulation of points that leads to a negligent operator designation. Because every case is unique, it is essential to consult with an attorney who can carefully analyze the specific details of your situation and tailor a legal strategy designed to achieve the best possible outcome.

Contacting a Los Angeles DUI Lawyer

If you have received a notification from the DMV regarding a potential negligent operator designation, or if you believe your current driving record puts you at risk of a license suspension, it is crucial to seek legal advice without delay. Early intervention by an experienced attorney can help preserve your right to an administrative hearing and provide the necessary time to thoroughly investigate your driving history and prepare a robust defense. In many cases, taking timely legal action can be instrumental in protecting your driving privileges and preventing the significant disruption that comes with the loss of your driver's license.

Attorney Michael Kraut, based at the Kraut Law Group Criminal & DUI Lawyers in Los Angeles, CA, offers extensive experience in both DUI defense and DMV administrative hearings. With over 14 years as a former Deputy District Attorney, Mr. Kraut possesses a deep understanding of how the DMV operates and how prosecutors build cases for DUI and related charges. His firm is committed to helping clients maintain their driving privileges and providing vigorous defense in court. For more information about Los Angeles negligent operator laws, DUI defense strategies, and how to challenge a DMV suspension, you can contact Michael Kraut for a free consultation. He can be reached 24/7. Whether you are facing an upcoming DMV hearing or fighting new DUI charges, understanding your rights and available options is the crucial first step toward achieving a favorable resolution.


Client Reviews
★★★★★
Michael Kraut is outstanding! He genuinely cared about my case and instructed my mom and I throughout the entire process. He was very clear on what he needed in order to receive the best results. He kept us updated until the end. I thank him so much for getting my charges rejected. I highly recommend him to anyone with legal needs! Shaquan
★★★★★
I contacted Michael with concern for my personal and business reputation. He was very reassuring and confident the entire time. After about 3 weeks it was determined that no charges were being filed by any agency and I was in the clear of any investigation. One thing that is amazing is just how FAST Michael is at replying to phone calls, texts, and even emails! We are talking under 30 minutes in most cases. That is unheard of for most attorneys! Michael is incredible and not your typical run of the mill attorney. For best results hire him if you feel like you might be under investigation or could face charges. Even if you know you are innocent it is best to take care of the smoke before it becomes a fire. Brad
★★★★★
Michael Kraut is-hands down-the best criminal defense attorney and I can't begin to thank him for all that he did for me and my family. I reached out to him in the middle of the night and less than a couple hours later, he had gotten back to me and scheduled a meeting. He's a no-nonsense attorney who knows how to get the job done! From the second we retained him, I had peace of mind in knowing that we were in the best hands possible. If Michael Kraut couldn't get it done, I knew that it couldn't be done at all. You can't put a price tag on your freedom. He was worth every single penny. Lida
★★★★★
Michael Kraut is an outstanding attorney. He was extremely professional, and straightforward, yet sensitive with my case. I am confident I made the right choice by hiring Michael. I highly recommend him to anyone seeking a truly experienced lawyer. Daniel
★★★★★
Michael Kraut - I cannot thank you enough for all that you did for ​my son. When I came to you I read that you used to be a district attorney but I never knew how much that meant until I watch you in court. I knew it took 3 months but the final day when I heard the judge say that all charges were dismissed it was all worth it! I will always be grateful for all that you did for us. A.N.
Contact Us